Page 1 of 1

The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 2:42 pm
by whc03grady
Image

More here.

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:47 pm
by Kubelwagen
I.... kind of like it!

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:50 am
by Amskeptic
I am so glad they woke up in time . . .

The original VW design survived because it is truly one of the most brilliant designs ever to turn in 3-D. There is not one clumsy angle.
The '50s redesign suggested here has some . . . ungainly angles and weights that would have destined it to the same failure that greeted its peers.

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:57 am
by dingo
i disagree emphatically...i like the design quite a bit... a few tweaks here and there and it could have exuded a sturdiness that the beetle never did, and the ghia only hinted at

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:15 am
by Amskeptic
dingo wrote:i disagree emphatically...i like the design quite a bit... a few tweaks here and there and it could have exuded a sturdiness that the beetle never did, and the ghia only hinted at
Ungainly! False curves! Truncated rear side glass! No balance! Dog haunches like an ugly Fiat on the side . . . whereas the sweep of the rear fenders into the deck lid of the real beetle is lean and gorgeous. The Beetle looks like nothing else because it has no stupid styling gimmickry!

Image

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:28 pm
by whc03grady
Amskeptic wrote:Ungainly! False curves! Truncated rear side glass! No balance! Dog haunches like an ugly Fiat on the side . . . whereas the sweep of the rear fenders into the deck lid of the real beetle is lean and gorgeous. The Beetle looks like nothing else because it has no stupid styling gimmickry!
Agreed 100%; the redesign is gross. Somehow they managed to make it look older.
To say the Beetle (the real one) has no stupid styling gimmickry isn't to say it doesn't have style. I'd say the Beetle is in fact an excellent example of an early, restrained (i.e., Teutonic) Art Deco/Streamline Moderne aesthetic. Splitty buses are a late (very late) example.

Bay window buses (and Type 3s to a lesser extent) are pure neo-functionalist. Their similarity to the IBM Selectric typewriter is undeniable.

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:33 pm
by Lanval
And what do you make of the vanagon and other 80's abominations? I never was a fan of the boxy look ~ the Rabbit (best friend had a diesel rabbit all through college; other good friend had a ratty scirocco that he drove like a F1 racer) and the vanagon always have an element of Brutalism and/or socialist/communist minmalist/functionalist about them... but I still drive a vanagon because it's loads faster and easier to drive than the older VWs. (in all fairness, next car is either a restorable scirocco, or pre 73 914)

Re: The 1950s Beetle Redesign that Wasn't

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:29 pm
by Amskeptic
Lanval wrote:And what do you make of the vanagon Brutalism and/or socialist/communist minmalist/functionalist about them...
but I still drive a vanagon because it's loads faster and easier to drive than the older VWs.
Spot-on. Brutalist describes the unyielding boxyness.
Colin