Page 2 of 4

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:04 am
by Lanval
chitwnvw wrote:
Cindy wrote:...improperly combined.

Cindy
Who gets to decide what is proper?
Turn your question around ~ who gets to decide what's not proper?

Michael L

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:53 pm
by SlowLane
Lanval wrote:Turn your question around ~ who gets to decide what's not proper?
Funny, I don't see a tilde in this list of acceptable separators:
Lanval wrote: 1. comma + conjunction
2. Semicolon
3. Colon (if followed by a list, or direct statement)
4. Period
:joker:

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:38 pm
by Lanval
SlowLane wrote:
Lanval wrote:Turn your question around ~ who gets to decide what's not proper?
Funny, I don't see a tilde in this list of acceptable separators:
Lanval wrote: 1. comma + conjunction
2. Semicolon
3. Colon (if followed by a list, or direct statement)
4. Period
:joker:
Sadly, other punctuation marks like the tilde (~) and dash (-) are not generically acceptable; they can only be used in certain ways; truly the colon fits that requirement too, but is used so often that it remains on the list. Neither the tilde nor the dash would be acceptable to deal with my sample run-on (or most run-ons for that matter)

I like fish ~ I like beef. (ugh. no.)
I like fish - I like beef. (better, but still no.)

:study:
Michael L

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:30 pm
by SlowLane
And then there's this classic application of punctuation to verbal communication: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF4qii8S3gw

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:40 am
by bretski
Lanval wrote: Turn your question around ~ who gets to decide what's not proper?
Was that a koan? I am devoid of enlightenment my sentence runs on...

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:26 am
by Amskeptic
Cindy wrote:A run-on sentence is two or more complete sentences (of any length) improperly combined.

Cindy
I have never improperly combined a sentence, after which we all went home.

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:15 am
by Lanval
SlowLane wrote:
Lanval wrote:Turn your question around ~ who gets to decide what's not proper?
Funny, I don't see a tilde in this list of acceptable separators:
Lanval wrote: 1. comma + conjunction
2. Semicolon
3. Colon (if followed by a list, or direct statement)
4. Period
:joker:
Heh. Hee-hee. Tee-hee-hee...

:geek:

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:21 am
by Lanval
Alternatively, to quote Orpheus: "You must learn, Slowlane, just as I did, that there is a difference between knowing the path and following path."

Or more seriously ~ knowing the rules of grammar as I thoroughly as I do, I am not constrained by the limits of the rules, for I know when they can be broken with impunity. I don't recommend it for everyone. While it's clear that someone with Colin's knowledge can drop a VW engine any old place and get it back together without too much trouble, I lack his knowledge and hence dare not do such a thing; it's strictly acceptable places to work (driveway/garage/my own property) for me.

That overly-serious aside aside, your comment is pretty funny. :tongue:

Michael L

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:23 am
by Lanval
Finally, and more pointedly:
Lanval wrote:Sadly, other punctuation marks like the tilde (~) and dash (-) are not generically acceptable; they can only be used in certain ways...
The tilde and dash have uses, but they are limited to certain types of expressions and emphases.

Pedantically yours,

Michael L

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:38 pm
by Cindy
Amskeptic wrote:
Cindy wrote:A run-on sentence is two or more complete sentences (of any length) improperly combined.

Cindy
I have never improperly combined a sentence, after which we all went home.
Do you walk to school or carry your lunch?

Cindy

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:12 pm
by ruckman101
ruckman101 wrote:
Curious pits in the old bushing not in the new one.


Those are beautiful lubrication traps.
Colin


Koaned again. Gentle nudges to trust my own judgement before I hopelessly mangle original to replace with newer of lesser quality.

Generally I was trained by a now decades old AP Stylebook. "Koaned" is right out. "Another koan," would be appropriate.



neal

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:34 pm
by Amskeptic
Cindy wrote:
Amskeptic wrote:
Cindy wrote:A run-on sentence is two or more complete sentences (of any length) improperly combined.

Cindy
I have never improperly combined a sentence, after which we all went home.
Do you walk to school or carry your lunch?

Cindy
I do that?
Do you walk to school, or carry your lunch, do you read the stars, or ponder grammar, do you seek questions or just opportunities to answer? Well? Do you, punk?

I do combine perhaps unlikely ideas . . . is there an example of one of my improper run-on sentences you could steer me to? I am in hell with some spots in the book, and I need to see if I have been laboring under some grammatical assumptions that will be a trainwreck if they make it into print.
semi-Colon

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:09 pm
by SlowLane
Lanval wrote:~ knowing the rules of grammar as I thoroughly as I do, I am not constrained by the limits of the rules, for I know when they can be broken with impunity. I don't recommend it for everyone.
Ah, I love the smell of hubris in the evening. It smells like, no wait, that's my gym socks.

"Don't try this at home kids. Grammmatical infractions as egregious as I'm about to commit should only be attempted by seasoned professionals such as myself."

Michael, I realize you have worked long and hard to achieve what you have achieved professionally. That doesn't excuse you from proof-reading before you hit the "submit" button, especially when making a statement like the one quoted.

Cheers. Have you found a source of Trumer Pils down there yet? :sunny:
Lyle

PS: God is an iron. (Any other Spider Robinson fans out there?)

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:49 am
by Lanval
SlowLane wrote:
Lanval wrote:~ knowing the rules of grammar as I thoroughly as I do, I am not constrained by the limits of the rules, for I know when they can be broken with impunity. I don't recommend it for everyone.
Ah, I love the smell of hubris in the evening. It smells like, no wait, that's my gym socks.

"Don't try this at home kids. Grammmatical infractions as egregious as I'm about to commit should only be attempted by seasoned professionals such as myself."

Michael, I realize you have worked long and hard to achieve what you have achieved professionally. That doesn't excuse you from proof-reading before you hit the "submit" button, especially when making a statement like the one quoted.

Cheers. Have you found a source of Trumer Pils down there yet? :sunny:
Lyle
Wait... what? You thought that was accidental?! In the words of that great wordsmith, Will Smith, "Ah hell no!" I was just testing your iron-O-meter. Everything seems to be in working order; nothing to see here ~ move along.

*checks to see if they bought it*

I always say, "If ya gotta be hoisted, use your own petard; it's more comfortable!"

Re: Colin's Koans

Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:48 am
by Amskeptic
Lanval wrote:
SlowLane wrote:
Lanval wrote:~ knowing the rules of grammar as I thoroughly as I do, I am not constrained by the limits of the rules,
Ah, I love the smell of hubris in the evening.
nothing to see here ~ move along.

*checks to see if they bought it*

I always say, "If ya gotta be hoisted, use your own petard; it's more comfortable!"
A classic! The entire human condition in three posts.
Colin