That's a stretch. We are in an age of passivity. I don't think you can tar today's liberals shouting down Bush I in 1985.hippiewannabe wrote:October, 1985.
Colin
That's a stretch. We are in an age of passivity. I don't think you can tar today's liberals shouting down Bush I in 1985.hippiewannabe wrote:October, 1985.
Tea Party didn't exist 20+ years ago, so I guess they were lacky's? Completely agree about the gov'ts role of leveling the playing field...figuring out how much intervention is either 'too much' or 'not enough' that is the interesting question.Bleyseng wrote:Tea Partyer's or Koch Bros lacky's...TrollFromDownBelow wrote: I can guarantee you the professors I had Michigan State University's B school were of a free market mind set, limited gov't intervention, etc.
I have always been on the side of controlled Capitalism ....... Government intervention is about leveling the playing field so that there is no one exploiting the rest for their own gain.....
hambone wrote: There are those out there with no other aim but to bunch panties. It's like arguing with a pretzel.
Engage with them. Converse with them. Convince them to vote to save their futures from the oligarchy.Bleyseng wrote: The young people I know have a really hard time sorting thru all the mis-information from Foxnews, CNN etc.