Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:52 pm
by RussellK
ruckman101 wrote:
RussellK wrote:Well there you are sourcing information from the Southern Poverty Law Center. Some source of info that is. They even have the word Southern in their name. Just like Hillary became. Sure she started from up north but she spent time in Arkansas. And Poverty. Which is the opposite of monied and we all know what looks like it is, really isn't. And Law too. Sounds to me like a bunch of fancy pants lawyers. And Center. An obvious ruse. They aren't centered at all. They're a bunch of lefties. And not only that I'll bet they went to the same church as that Binderburg fella. Granted I have no proof but that little inconvenience is never a bother. This is the internet where I can waste bandwidth will nilly. So there you have it. The Southern Poverty Law Center is actually a front that funds a super secret plan deep inside NASA to send toe jam to the moon to replace the cheese we have been mining and giving away in the Federal free cheese giveaway making minions of cheese dependent bots. Don't believe me? You better or I'll call you stoopit.
No no no, wikipedia cited the Southern Poverty Law Center. Hey, did the SPLC sue the "Spotlight" publication that went broke and folded, an earlier incarnation of the American Free Press?

stoopit neal
stoopit pesky details

Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:28 am
by Randy in Maine
ruckman101 wrote:The wiki article is interesting regarding the list's source, American Free Press. Sounds great. But the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies the publication and it's group of editors as an active hate group. Apparently they're big on 9/11 theories, in what context I'm not sure.

neal
I did a little search on the the "American Free Press" and the people that run it and the "reporter". Very scary IMO.

Yes they do need to get back on the medications.

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:41 am
by steve74baywin
Randy in Maine wrote:You need to start thinking more critically. That thing you posted is full of emotional crap that has little to no bearing on facts and is just another opinion piece.

To quote the lated Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan....Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions, but not their own facts.

Here is the official list (including the correct HHS secretary):

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet/
Who they have as HHS was probably correct at the time it was written. To the best of my knowledge he did hold the position at first.

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:29 am
by RussellK
steve74baywin wrote:
Randy in Maine wrote:You need to start thinking more critically. That thing you posted is full of emotional crap that has little to no bearing on facts and is just another opinion piece.

To quote the lated Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan....Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions, but not their own facts.

Here is the official list (including the correct HHS secretary):

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet/
Who they have as HHS was probably correct at the time it was written. To the best of my knowledge he did hold the position at first.

he withdrew his nomination....damn pesky details again

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:35 am
by steve74baywin
RussellK wrote:
steve74baywin wrote: Who they have as HHS was probably correct at the time it was written. To the best of my knowledge he did hold the position at first.

he withdrew his nomination....damn pesky details again
Thanks Russel

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:11 pm
by blatzer
if it's news, it's not, if it's not news, it is!
details at 6!

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:00 am
by midatlanticys
Seems like the most common line item on the original list of Cabinet members is "Council on Foreign Relations" - can anyone offer some insight into the "real" purpose and objective of this hallowed Council??

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:16 am
by Randy in Maine
The short answer is that it is a bunch of thinkers, movers and groovers. Lot of old shcool players and new school wanabees. Nothing wrong with it if you have ambitions of being a mover in the future.

You can read up here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on ... _Relations

A lot of the conspircy nutjobs out there are convinced that it is what is plotting the next "one world government", but they are also convinced that Columbus faked getting to the new world in 1492.

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:03 pm
by steve74baywin
Randy in Maine wrote:The short answer is that it is a bunch of thinkers, movers and groovers. Lot of old shcool players and new school wanabees. Nothing wrong with it if you have ambitions of being a mover in the future.

You can read up here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on ... _Relations

A lot of the conspircy nutjobs out there are convinced that it is what is plotting the next "one world government", but they are also convinced that Columbus faked getting to the new world in 1492.
So, you know what I think of them so does that mean you called me a nutjob?
BTW, Have you ever read the original intent of the CFR as written by them that started it?
It is not a theory, it is fact Randy.....If you want to just believe the fake theories in the news and not pay attention to fact that is fine....
It is all right there to be found in dairies and minutes to the meeting....
Once you take the time to read the intent of it, and who started it, you then can see it was the same people behind the Federal Reserve...

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:34 am
by Velokid1
"My name is Inigo Montoya. You called me nutjob. Prepare to die."

Image

Re: Obama's cabinet

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:25 pm
by steve74baywin
What a shame.
We never did have a serious discussion of the back ground of all the people Obama appointed.

If Ron Paul ever gets in office I am going to look into everyone that surrounds him. I will probably look much deeper because I voted for him and would want to see what kind of people surround him.
In Reagan time it was eluded that cronies got forced upon him. I would want to see who ends up around my candidate either by choice or force.