You've read this yeah?poptop tom wrote:
But the valve geometry has me worried a tad!
http://forums.aircooledtechnology.com/s ... d.php?t=25
You've read this yeah?poptop tom wrote:
But the valve geometry has me worried a tad!
I am not talking about the feeler blade and all that junk bolted up to the outside of the case.poptop tom wrote:
Is there an advantage to using the feeler blade, in this application, over the dial indicator?
I have it printed out right here! Certainly a help!Westy78 wrote:You've read this yeah?poptop tom wrote:
But the valve geometry has me worried a tad!
http://forums.aircooledtechnology.com/s ... d.php?t=25
Colin,I am not talking about the feeler blade and all that junk bolted up to the outside of the case.
I am talking about the method where you set the end-play while the case is still apart using a feeler blade between the crankshaft and the #1 main bearing. This method guarantees you that any imperceptable movement of the bearing in the saddle does not inadvertently become part of your reading. It is a method I prefer when putting together an old engine . . . like my old one.
Colin
Geeze, I think I can make it a little easier than that.poptop tom wrote: I have it printed out right here! Certainly a help!
Easier than that would be wonderful, Colin! Some it still seems foreign to me.Amskeptic wrote:Geeze, I think I can make it a little easier than that.poptop tom wrote: I have it printed out right here! Certainly a help!
Your rocker arms describe an arc as they open a valve. Let's say at the beginning of the opening event that the adjusting screw is pushing "up" sideways on the valve stem. Midway, the screw is directly pushing the valve stem. At the later stage of opening the valve, the adjusting screw is pushing "down" sideways against the valve stem. This causes wear of the valve guide. We want the arc to be at the middle to divide the "up" wear and the "down" wear of the valve guide equally. Improper geometry will cause rapid wear primarily against one of the two possibilities above, shortening the lifespan of the guide.
Directions To Come . . .
Thanks spiff! I have a call in to John at ac.net. He should be in shortly!spiffy wrote:I believe Rocky Jennings here in Walla2 could help you out as well. He can probably machine any size you want if he doens't have them on hand.
That's a great explanation, and something I hadn't totally checked out. I will tomorrow. I did finally find the base shims from Cip1. Two-three day air delivery should get them to me soon. In the meantime, I slap my .020" shims on, P & C's on one side, and will mock up the cylinder head on there and check the clearance. Adrian, at Headflowmasters, did the heads, and the P & C's are Mahle 94 mm. Height measurements are all equal on the cylinders.Oregon72 wrote:This may have been mentioned already, Tom.
You've made sure your barrel fins don't interfere with the head. Right???This is important... Everybody says to not use head gaskets, but there are circumstances which allow you no other choice but to use em' (at least without the trouble of expensive machine work to your barrels). In order to determine whether or not you can elimate them, you need to make sure your heads weren't flycut too deep. There should be a little bit of space between the cylinder and the head so you know the barrel sealing surface is the part that is contacting the head for proper sealing not the fins. If you don't have a gap, you are then forced to use the cylinder to head gasket otherwise you will have a horrible compression leak. If your heads were not flycut too deep, you are in luck and can then eliminate the cylinder to head gasket and go to work solely with your base shims (case to barrel) to get your proper deck ht.
That's probably not a great explanation, but hopefully it makes sense.