Your understanding of the situation is deeply flawed turk. The bulk of Saddam's butchering and slaughtering of his citizens occurred before the NFZ was put in place and with full support from our government. After the NFZ was put in place, both the Kurds and Marsh Arabs rebelled with our government's encouragement, but then our government stepped back and left them to be killed by Saddam. From there it was the normal day to day business for Saddam, still brutal, but no more massacres as there had been in the past. So the NFZs were effective, even to an extent for the Iraqi populace.
http://civilliberty.about.com/od/intern ... ussein.htm
".... But what this rhetoric does not reflect is that, until 1991, Saddam Hussein was allowed to commit his atrocities with the full support of the U.S. government. The specifics of the al-Anfal Campaign were no mystery to the Reagan administration, but the decision was made to support the genocidal Iraqi government over the pro-Soviet theocracy of Iran, even to the point of making ourselves complicit in crimes against humanity.
....
Saddam Hussein was unquestionably one of the most brutal dictators of the 20th century. History cannot even begin to record the full scale of his atrocities and the effect they had on those affected and the families of those affected. But his most horrific acts, including the al-Anfal genocide, were committed in full view of our government--the government that we present to the world as a shining beacon of human rights.
Make no mistake: The ouster of Saddam Hussein was a victory for human rights, and if there is any silver lining to come from the brutal Iraq War, it is that Hussein is no longer slaughtering and torturing his own people. But we should fully recognize that every indictment, every epithet, every moral condemnation we issue against Saddam Hussein also indicts us. We should all be ashamed of the atrocities that were committed under our leaders' noses, and with our leaders' blessing."
Rah rah, wave that flag.
neal
The slipper has no teeth.