Seen Scott Walker answer tough questions lately?72Hardtop wrote: Hillary would make a better lawyer due to her ability at being less than honest when confronted with tough questions.
Seen Chris Christie answer tough questions?
Marco Rubio, try to answer questions about "escaping" Cuba before he was born?
Ted Cruz, try to explain why he is not Canadian but Obama is Kenyan?
Rand Paul, ever seen him answer a question about his dad's magazine?
Hillary snapped "what difference does it make?" when people tried to parse terrorist vs surprise attack in Benghazi. As a Human Being, I understood exactly what she was so exasperated about. Chris Stevens was her friend. I give her points for being human.
I can catch you in any number of lies. Yes, I can. Give me twenty years of hounding your every statement and I will catch you changing your mind, explaining things differently, screwing up on dates and god forbid if I should pore over your credit cards and emails and phone records and find out that you have been seeing that hot little Asian thang on the side, man, then you will be both lying and flustered and belligerent, and if you then exploded, "my personal life is MINE!" guess what? I would agree with you.
I am not so worried about Hillary's truthfulness when I trust her character. I trust her character over any of the republicans easily. I think she understands things on a level much like Obama, she understands prejudice, she understands judgmentalism, she understands bias, marginalization, disenfranchisement, etc, on a level that no republican candidate can possibly articulate in today's plasticky world of republican political candidate doll. She does have to amass money, lots of it, to play "campaign". That is a sickness we all are suffering currently.
The president is not the cause of the ills in Washington. Like I said, it is touchingly childish in a grotesque sort of way that people *blame* Obama for the devisiveness in Washington. The president can try and try to change things, but when the leaders of the other branch say "let's say 'no' to everything this president proposes" or "let's make sure that this is a one-term president", then the problem is in other branch.72Hardtop wrote: Her qualifications are lacking for a seat as president...seriously lacking. Unless of course you wish to continue on with the current beat of the drum politics in Washington? Voting her in is an absolute guarantee nothing will change.Is she supportive of term limits? No special interest money? No. Time for real change folks.
And that is the truth. Our Congress is pathetic.
Colin